Presidential debate: How the world’s media reacted

Presidential debate: How the world's media reacted
Donald Trump and Joe Biden on stage for the first presidential debate Symbol copyright Reuters Image caption International media criticised the tone and content of the talk

US electorate have endured the first of 3 presidential debates among President Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

The Development has additionally prompted a huge response from international audiences who tuned in for the chaotic event.

Newspapers and commentators across the international have criticised the tone and tactics of the controversy.

As The Days in the UK wrote, “The clearest loser from the first presidential debate among Donald Trump and Joe Biden used to be The Us.”


The paper went additional, pronouncing the event “used to be not a debate in any meaningful sense” however relatively “an ill-tempered and at times incomprehensible squabble between offended septuagenarians who palpably detest one another”.

‘The loser is us, the yank people’ Who received the Trump-Biden debate?

The Guardian defined it as a “national humiliation”.

“The Remainder of the world – and long run historians – will presumably take a look at it and weep,” the paper wrote, adding that Mr Biden used to be the one man who looked “remotely presidential” on the degree and saying that if Mr Trump was re-elected in November, “this dark, frightening, unwatchable fever dream will surely be the primary line of The Us’s obituary.”

Media playback is unsupported in your instrument

Media caption”Shut up, man” and other insults and interruptions

The Monetary Instances highlighted how the president had stoked lies approximately voter fraud and recommended his supporters to rigorously watch polling stations. “‘Dog-whistling’ is the politico-speak for such language, nevertheless it implies subtlety. Mr Trump was once blatant,” it wrote.

The paper also cited that snap polls after the event stated Mr Biden had come out on best. “However no person with a handle American democracy may have switched off feeling the rest however queasy.”


“Chaotic, infantile, gruelling” – that is how French newspaper Libération described Tuesday’s debate. Le Monde agreed, calling it a “bad hurricane”, and pronouncing that the president had sought to “push his opponent off his hinges” with constant interruptions and by way of mocking his solutions.

Trump and Biden’s debate claims fact-checked How is Donald Trump doing in the polls?

Le Figaro said Mr Biden had “systematically refused to play his opponent’s recreation”. While Mr Trump tried to immediately confront his challenger, pointing at him and addressing him instantly, the Democratic candidate spoke more to audience and appeared straight away into the digital camera.

Media playback is unsupported on your instrument

Media captionBiden: ‘Do you think for a moment what he is telling you?’

“Trump electorate are unlikely to have had any doubts approximately their candidate, regardless of an unconvincing efficiency. The Ones of Biden, on the different hand, had confirmation that the Democrat was able to measure up to his ambitious opponent, or even positioned him on the protective,” the paper wrote.


Der Spiegel’s analysis of the debate is headlined “A TV duel like a automobile coincidence”.

In a piece titled “Part fist-fight, phase play”, Süddeutsche Zeitung wrote: “Both Trump and Biden could cross house happy because as far as the theatrical performance is concerned, each did their task correctly. Donald Trump performed Donald Trump, Joe Biden played Joe Biden, and fans should have appreciated it.”

Where does Donald Trump stand on key issues? What Joe Biden wants to do

Die Welt mentioned the controversy had revealed very little about policy. “most importantly, it showed that The Usa has a president whose behaviour stands out and who lacks self-keep an eye on – but that is not precisely news,” it wrote.

Mr Biden against this was once no longer an exhilarating candidate however “no less than someone with commonsense and a solid character” who might “carry something like normalcy again to the White Area”.


“Never had American politics sunk so low,” Los Angeles Repubblica’s US correspondent wrote, describing the talk as “Chaotic, rowdy, and in keeping with mutual contempt”.

Il Corriere della Sera meanwhile said President Trump’s refusal to condemn white supremacy was once “a message for Black The Us”.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionTrump: “I Do Not know who the Proud Boys are”


One broadcaster defined it as a “one and a part-hour trade of insults”, while any other stated there was “no constructive dialogue”.

“The rivals saved interrupting each other and instead of a balanced dialogue they chose the trail of mutual insults,” pro-Kremlin NTV tv said.

Who Russia, China and Iran need to win US election Who will be the following US president? you make a decision

Mr Biden’s description of President Trump as “Putin’s puppy” additionally generated feedback on Russian social media. One Twitter person stated: “Two old men are working out which of them is more worthy to develop into the president of the U.s., but with out Putin, you can not spice up your rating.”


Chinese legit media websites broadly omitted the u.s. debate despite the fact that a few wrote approximately how both candidates had used China to assault their opponent.

an editorial in the state-run World Times called it “the most chaotic presidential debate ever” and stated that Mr Trump had taken “intention at China via blaming it for the raging Covid-19 epidemic and US financial woes”.

Editor-in-leader Hu Xijin wrote on Twitter that the talk reflected “department, nervousness of us society and the accelerating lack of benefits of the u.s. political device”.

Media playback is unsupported in your instrument

Media captionCoronavirus: Trump shows China ‘let it spread’


Hindi-language news channel AajTak accused both applicants of “dust-slinging”, whilst broadcaster Instances Now stated the talk was once “marred with personal jibes and political barbs”.

However the most powerful commentary got here from The Days of India, the country’s greatest-promoting English-language newspaper, which when compared the talk to “dust-wrestling”.

“the u.s. embarrassed itself earlier than the sector for 100 minutes,” it wrote.

Media playback is unsupported for your instrument

Media captionHow the us information networks reacted to the first presidential debate

BBC Monitoring contributed to this record.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *